- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-272/18: Action brought on 27 April 2018 — EBM Technologies v EUIPO (MobiPACS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0272
62018TN0272
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-272/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: EBM Technologies Inc. (Taipei City, Taiwan) (represented by: J. Liesegang, M. Jost and N. Lang, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MobiPACS’ — Application for registration No 16 400 061
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 February 2018 in Case R 2145/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 42(1), read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.