I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 112/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: DEC Technologies BV (Enschede, Netherlands) (represented by: R. Brtka, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tehnoexport d.o.o. (Indjija, Serbia)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES — European Union trade mark No 18 194 573
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 December 2022 in Case R 2009/2021-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.