- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-813/17: Action brought on 14 December 2017 — Nerantzaki v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0813
62017TN0813
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.2.2018
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/39
(Case T-813/17)
(2018/C 052/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eleni Nerantzaki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the EPSO selection board of 7 March 2017 not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/331/16;
—annul the decision of the appointing authority Ares(2017)s. 4916702 of 14 September 2017, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision not to admit the applicant to open competition EPSO/AD/331/16;
—order the defendant to pay the applicant’s legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the present application.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment by the defendant in the assessment of the applicant’s professional qualifications.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the notice of competition EPSO/AD/331/16.
3.Third plea in law, alleging inadequate and contradictory reasoning such as to constitute a breach both of Article 25 and of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations.