- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-20/15: Action brought on 14 January 2015 — Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei v OHIM — Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini (PICCOLOMINI)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0020
62015TN0020
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/34
(Case T-20/15)
(2015/C 089/41)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Henkell & Co. Sektkellerei KG (Wiesbaden, Germany) (represented by: J. Flick, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona di Bianchini Società Agricola (Milano, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘PICCOLOMINI’ — Application for registration No 10 564 573
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 October 2014 in Case R 2265/2013-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order OHIM and the third party to bear the costs of proceedings including the costs of the Applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.