I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 463/26)
Language of the case: Italian
Appellant: Società Italiana Imprese Balneari Srl
Respondents: Comune di Rosignano Marittimo, Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia del demanio — Direzione regionale Toscana e Umbria, Regione Toscana
Do Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and the principles arising from the Laezza judgment (C-375/14), where applicable, preclude the interpretation of a national provision such as Article 49 [of the Italian Shipping Code] as meaning that it results in the transfer without consideration and without compensation, by the concessionaire on expiry of the concession, when that concession has been renewed on an uninterrupted basis, where applicable by virtue of a new measure, of the building works constructed on the State-owned land forming part of the complex of assets organised for the operation of the resort enterprise, since that effect of immediate forfeiture could constitute a restriction that goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objective actually pursued by the national legislature and is therefore disproportionate to the aim?