- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-88/20: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux — France) — Criminal proceedings against ENR Grenelle Habitat SARL, EP, FQ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Fundamental rights — Ne bis in idem principle — Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts — Cold calling — Misleading commercial practice — Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CB0088
62020CB0088
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/10
(Case C-88/20) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Fundamental rights - Ne bis in idem principle - Joint imposition of administrative and criminal penalties for identical facts - Cold calling - Misleading commercial practice - Insufficient justification for a reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2021/C 320/11)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the tribunal correctionnel de Bordeaux (Criminal Court, Bordeaux, France), by decision of 12 December 2019, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: French
* * *
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140