- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-61/10: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission (Action for failure to act — Failure to adopt measures — Application for directions to be issued — Request for protective measures — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0061(01)
62010TB0061(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 13/25
(Case T-61/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Action for failure to act - Failure to adopt measures - Application for directions to be issued - Request for protective measures - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
2011/C 13/50
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez (Seville, Spain) (represented by: initially, N. Domínguez Varela and, subsequently, P. Suarez Plácido, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N Görlitz, P. López-Carceller, agents) and European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and I. Martinez del Peral, agents)
Re:
Application for a declaration of failure to act on the part of the European Parliament and the European Commission in that those institutions unlawfully failed to respond to the applicant’s letter of 6 October 2009, an application for directions to be issued and a request for protective measures.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Mr Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs.
3.There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Mr. Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and the ACT Petition Association.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 58.