EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-258/17: Action brought on 3 May 2017 — Arbuzov v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0258

62017TN0258

May 3, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/35

(Case T-258/17)

(2017/C 213/47)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Sergej Arbuzov (Kyiv, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as it relates to Sergej Arbuzov;

order the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sergej Arbuzov.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging breach of the right to good administration

The applicant bases his application inter alia on the fact that the Council of the European Union did not proceed with proper care when adopting Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017, since it did not, before adopting the contested decision, address the applicant’s arguments and the evidence presented by him which supported his case, and proceeded essentially on the basis of a brief summary by the Ukraine Chief Public Prosecutor’s office without requiring any additional information on the progress of the investigation in Ukraine.

2.Second plea in law, alleging breach of the applicant’s right to property

The applicant submits in this respect that the restrictions adopted with respect to him are disproportionate and unnecessary and breach the guarantees of international law protection of his right to property.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia