I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases T-457/04 and T-223/05) (1)
(Common organisation of the markets - Bananas - Transitional measures - Article 30 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 404/93 - Judgment finding that the Commission had failed to act - Failure to give effect to a judgment of the Court - Action for annulment - Application for an order that effect be given to the judgment by way of financial equivalent - Compensation for non-material damage - Unlawful failure to act on the part of the Commission - Action for damages - Suspension of the limitation period - Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice - Inadmissibility)
(2008/C 313/46)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Camar Srl (Florence, Italy) (represented by: W. Viscardini, S. Donà and M. Paolin, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by: L. Visaggio, later by F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
In Case T-457/04, application, first, for annulment of the Commission's decision not to give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of 8 June 2000, Camar and Tico v Commission and Council (Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98 [2000] ECR II-2193), contained in the letter of 10 September 2004, secondly, for an order that the Commission give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the abovementioned judgment in Camar and Tico v Commission and Council by the financial equivalent of the value of the certificates that it has not issued and, thirdly, for an order that the Commission pay compensation for non-material loss, and in Case T-223/05, application for an order that the Commission pay compensation, on the basis of the non-contractual liability of the European Community, for the loss which the applicant has suffered.
The Court:
1.annuls the decision of the Commission contained in the letter of 10 September 2004 from the Director General of the Directorate General ‘Agriculture’ refusing to give effect to paragraph 1 of the operative part of the judgment of the Court of 8 June 2000, Camar and Tico v Commission and Council (Joined Cases T-79/96, T-260/97 and T-117/98 [2000] ECR II-2193);
2.for the rest, dismisses the action in Case T-457/04 as unfounded;
3.dismisses the action in T-223/05 as inadmissible;
4.in Case T-457/04, orders Camar Srl and the Commission each to bear half of their own costs and to pay half of the costs of the other party;
5.in Case T-223/05, orders Camar Srl to bear its own costs and to pay the Commission's costs.
(1) OJ C 31, 5.2.2005.