I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
3.2.2025
(Case T-628/24)
(C/2025/588)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Lego A/S (Billund, Denmark) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guangdong Qman Toys Industry Co. Ltd (Shantou, China)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: Community design (Building blocks from a toy building set) – Community design No 1 050 645-0003
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2024 in Case R 162/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and, if the other party to the proceedings before the Office intervenes, the intervener to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/588/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—