- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-651/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 September 2022 — KL v EIB (Civil service — Personnel of the EIB — Unjustified absences — Failure to report for medical examination — Action for annulment and for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0651
62020TA0651
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.10.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 418/20
(Case T-651/20) (*)
(Civil service - Personnel of the EIB - Unjustified absences - Failure to report for medical examination - Action for annulment and for damages)
(2022/C 418/24)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: KL (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and I. Zanin, acting as Agents, and A. Duron, lawyer)
Re:
By his action, based on Article 270 TFEU read in conjunction with Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 February 2020 to the effect that his absences from the medical examinations of 23 December 2019, 3 and 28 February 2020 were unjustified absences under Article 3.6 of the Annex X to the EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB's Staff Regulations, and, secondly, compensation for the damage he suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 February 2020 that KL's absences from medical examinations on 23 December 2019, 3 and 28 February 2020 were unjustified absences under Article 3.6 of Annex X to EIB Staff Rules, adopted in implementation of the EIB Staff Regulations;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the action;
3.Orders the EIB to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140