EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-594/23: Action brought on 25 September 2023 — PS v SEAE

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0594

62023TN0594

September 25, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/773

(Case T-594/23)

(C/2023/773)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PS (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the defendant dated 14 June 2023 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 22 December 2022;

order the defendant to compensate the professional damage (assessed to 135 000 euros) and the moral damage (assessed to 25 000 euros); and

order the defendant to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant for the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant committed faults stemming from a significant lack of duty of care and misconduct of the administration, in relation to:

the pre-posting compulsory seminar to which the applicant was denied attendance; and

the refusal to sign a two-year lease housing contract in Washington.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant committed faults with regard to:

the actions and decisions taken by the defendant during the recruitment and taking up of duty;

the maladministration and management regarding the attribution of responsibilities.

3.Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant suffered professional and moral prejudices:

the faulty behaviour of the administration led to a degradation in his professional level and prestige. Indeed, the applicant was never assigned the responsibilities and function he was hired for and as a result of his work circumstances during the relevant period, the applicant’s professional career has suffered an irreparable professional damage;

the defendant’s behaviour has caused him stress and anxiety, since he was under-estimated in his professional capacities, leading to a sick leave prescription.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging a flagrant link of causality between the fault committed by the defendant and the harm suffered by the applicant.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/773/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia