EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-160/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 10 December 2020 — Comune di Milano v European Commission (Appeal — State aid — Air transport sector — Groundhandling services at Milan-Linate (Italy) and Milan-Malpensa (Italy) airports — Capital injections made by the operator of those airports into its wholly owned subsidiary providing those services — Public shareholding of the operator — Decision declaring those State aid measures unlawful and incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(1) TFEU — Concepts of ‘State resources’, ‘measure imputable to the State’ and ‘economic advantage’ — Private operator principle — Private investor test — Burden of proof — Complex financial assessments — Intensity of judicial review — Distortion of the evidence)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0160

62019CA0160

December 10, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

8.2.2021

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/6

(Case C-160/19 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - State aid - Air transport sector - Groundhandling services at Milan-Linate (Italy) and Milan-Malpensa (Italy) airports - Capital injections made by the operator of those airports into its wholly owned subsidiary providing those services - Public shareholding of the operator - Decision declaring those State aid measures unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(1) TFEU - Concepts of ‘State resources’, ‘measure imputable to the State’ and ‘economic advantage’ - Private operator principle - Private investor test - Burden of proof - Complex financial assessments - Intensity of judicial review - Distortion of the evidence)

(2021/C 44/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Appellant: Comune di Milano (represented by: A. Mandarano, E. Barbagiovanni, S. Grassani and L. Picciano, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia, G. Conte and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders the Comune di Milano to pay the costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia