- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-174/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 23 January 2014 — Commission v BO (Appeal — Civil Service — Contractual agents — Social security — Reimbursement of transport costs — Transport costs incurred for linguistic reasons — Article 19(2) of the Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials of the European Communities — Paragraph 2.5 in Chapter 12 of Title II of the general implementing directives concerning the reimbursement of medical costs)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TA0174
62013TA0174
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.3.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/20
(Case T-174/13 P) (*)
(Appeal - Civil Service - Contractual agents - Social security - Reimbursement of transport costs - Transport costs incurred for linguistic reasons - Article 19(2) of the Joint rules on sickness insurance for officials of the European Communities - Paragraph 2.5 in Chapter 12 of Title II of the general implementing directives concerning the reimbursement of medical costs)
(2014/C 71/37)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: BO (Amman, Jordan) (represented by: L. Levi, M. Vandenbussche and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment delivered by the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) on 15 January 2013 in Case F-27/11 BO v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that judgment.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the European Commission to bear its costs and those incurred by BO in the context of the present proceedings.
(*) Language of the case: French.
OJ C 164, 8.6.2013.