- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-591/14: Action brought on 8 August 2014 — BSH v OHIM (PerfectRoast)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0591
62014TN0591
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.10.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 351/24
(Case T-591/14)
2014/C 351/30
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by S. Biagosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 16 June 2014 in Case R 359/2014-5;
—order OHIM to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘PerfectRoast’ for goods in Classes 7 and 11 — Community trade mark registration No 1 2 1 73 902
Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application for registration
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.