- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-490/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Gálóczhi-Tömösváry Róbert v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0490
62012CN0490
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/3
(Case C-490/12)
2013/C 79/06
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Gálóczhi-Tömösváry Róbert
Defendant: Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal
Questions referred
1.Can Article 30 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that that provision is intended to guarantee the possibility of a legal remedy only for unlawful and unjustified dismissal?
2.Does that provision mean that an employer is bound to provide the employee with reasons in writing on dismissal and the dismissal will then not be unjustified?
3.Does failure to communicate reasons in itself make the measure unlawful or may the employer state reasons subsequently in the course of any employment litigation?