- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-249/12 and T-269/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2015 — Vestel Iberia and Makro autoservicio mayorista v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Post-clearance entry in the accounts and remission of import duties — Colour television receivers originating in Turkey — Application for remission of customs duties submitted by two importers — Commission’s referral of the national authorities to a decision concerning another importer — Article 871(2) and (6) and Article 905(2) and (6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TA0249
62012TA0249
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.4.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/46
(Joined Cases T-249/12 and T-269/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - Customs union - Post-clearance entry in the accounts and remission of import duties - Colour television receivers originating in Turkey - Application for remission of customs duties submitted by two importers - Commission’s referral of the national authorities to a decision concerning another importer - Article 871(2) and (6) and Article 905(2) and (6) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
(2015/C 138/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Vestel Iberia, SL (Madrid, Spain) (Case T-249/12); and Makro autoservicio mayorista SA (Madrid) (Case T-269/12) (represented by: P. De Baere and P. Muñiz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, abogado del Estado)
Re:
Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 22 final of 18 January 2010 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and that remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1)Joins Cases T-249/12 and T-269/12 for the purposes of the present judgment;
2)Dismisses the actions as inadmissible;
3)Orders Vestel Iberia, SL and Makro autoservicio mayorista SA to pay the costs;
4)Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 235, 4.8.2012.