- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-205/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Pitești (Romania) lodged on 20 March 2018 — Maria-Cristina Dospinescu, Filofteia-Camelia Ganea, Petre Sinca, Luminița-Maria Ioniță, Maria Burduv and Raluca-Marinela Trașcă v Spitalul Județean de Urgență Vâlcea
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0205
62018CN0205
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-205/18)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Maria-Cristina Dospinescu, Filofteia-Camelia Ganea, Petre Sinca, Luminița-Maria Ioniță, Maria Burduv and Raluca-Marinela Trașcă
Respondent: Spitalul Județean de Urgență Vâlcea
Question referred
Must Articles 114(3), 151 and 153 TFEU, read in conjunction with Framework Directive 89/391/EEC (1) and the subsequent specific directives, be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing time limits and procedures which deny people access to justice for the purposes of having their workplaces classified as characterised by special conditions, with the result that newly-hired workers’ rights to safety and health at work, deriving from the assessment of those conditions in accordance with national legislation, are not recognised?
(1) Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (OJ 1989 L 183, p. 1).
* * *