- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-647/22: Action brought on 17 October 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Shoes)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0647
62022TN0647
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.12.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 463/59
(Case T-647/22)
(2022/C 463/87)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Waalwijck, Netherlands)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Design at issue: Community design No 3 320 555-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2022 in Case R 726/2021-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Failure to take into account the breach of contractual obligations and bad faith.