I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
13.1.2025
(Case T-1146/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Cardioflow - Earlier EU word mark CARDIOFORM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/181)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: W.L. Gore & Associates Inc. (Newark, Delaware, United States) (represented by: C. Tenkhoff and T. Herzog, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Angiokard med. Spritzguß GmbH (Friedeburg, Germany)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 27 September 2023 (Case R 739/2023-1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
OJ C C/2024/977, 29.1.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/181/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/181/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: English.