I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 179/21
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Annex Customs BVBA
Defendants:
1.Should Article 450c(1)(b) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 (1) of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as added by Article 1, point 53, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2787/2000 (2) of 15 December 2000, be interpreted as meaning that the notification referred to therein is only enforceable if it states the precise amounts that could possibly be claimed from the guarantor?
2.Should Article 450c(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as added by Article 1, point 53, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2787/2000 of 15 December 2000, be interpreted as meaning that the guarantor who, after having received a notification as referred to in Article 450c(1)(a) within three years of the date of acceptance of the transit declaration, receives a notification in which other amounts are mentioned than the amounts which are later claimed from him, is released from his obligations?
(1) OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1.
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2787/2000 of 15 December 2000 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 1993 L 330, p. 1).