- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-680/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — Funline International v EUIPO (AMSTERDAM POPPERS) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0680
62021TA0680
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 244/37
(Case T-680/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark AMSTERDAM POPPERS - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark contrary to public policy - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2022/C 244/50)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Funline International (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: Y. Echevarría García, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and modification of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 August 2021 (Case R 439/2021-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Funline International to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 502, 13.12.2021.