- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-908/16: Action brought on 20 December 2016 — Starbucks (HK) v EUIPO — Now Wireless (nowwireless)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0908
62016TN0908
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.2.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 46/28
(Case T-908/16)
(2017/C 046/32)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Starbucks (HK) Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: P. Kavanagh, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Now Wireless Ltd (Whyteleafe, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘nowwireless’ — Application for registration No 6 782 569
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 October 2016 in Case R 662/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, as well the decision given by the Opposition Division;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.