EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-69/09 P: Order of the Court of 22 January 2010 — Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl, Magan Italia Srl v European Commission (Expedited procedure)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CB0069

62009CB0069

January 22, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/12

(Case C-69/09 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)

2010/C 100/19

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Makhteshim-Agan Holding BV, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl, Magan Italia Srl (represented by: K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: N.B. Rasmussen and L. Parpala, Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2008 in Case T-393/06 Makhteshim-Agan Holding and Others v Commission in which the Court of First Instance declared inadmissible an action for annulment of the decision of the Commission not to submit a proposal for the inclusion of the active substance azinphos-methyl in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (OJ 1991 L 230, p. 1), allegedly contained in a letter of 12 October 2006 (D/531125) — Actionable measure

Operative part of the order

1.The application of Makhteshim-Agan Holding, Makhteshim-Agan Italia Srl and Magan Italia Srl that Case C-69/09 P be decided under an expedited procedure is rejected.

2.The costs are reserved.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 82, 04.04.2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia