EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-551/13: Action brought on 15 October 2013 — Radecki v OHIM — Vamed (AKTIVAMED)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0551

62013TN0551

October 15, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/36

(Case T-551/13)

2013/C 367/64

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Michael Radecki (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Menebröcker and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vamed AG (Vienna, Austria)

Form of order sought

Annul the decisions of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 July 2013 (Case R 365/2012-1);

order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Michael Radecki

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘AKTIVAMED’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 11 and 44 — Community trade mark No 8 958 886

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Vamed AG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Austrian figurative marks and international registration ‘VAMED’ for goods and services in Classes 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 20, 21, 28, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Decision of the Opposition Division annulled

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia