EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-367/14: Action brought on 28 May 2014 — August Storck v OHIM — Chiquita Brands (Fruitfuls)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0367

62014TN0367

May 28, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/33

(Case T-367/14)

2014/C 261/57

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: August Storck KG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Rohr, A.-C. Richter, P. Goldenbaum and T. Melchert, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Chiquita Brands LLC (Charlotte, United States)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 March 2014 in Case R 1580/2013-5;

Order the defendant to pay its own costs and those of the applicant, and, should Chiquita Brands LLC intervene in the proceedings, order Chiquita Brands LLC to pay its own costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The word mark ‘Fruitfuls’ for goods in Class 30 — Community trade mark registration No 5 014 519

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: Chiquita Brands LLC

Decision of the Cancellation Division: The trade mark was revoked

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia