- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-98/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 June 2013 — Jargeac and Others v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions for grant — Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FB0098
62011FB0098
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.8.2013
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/48
(Case F-98/11)(1)
(Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Conditions for grant - Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2013/C 252/85
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Bernard Jargeac and Others (Hostert, Luxembourg) (represented initially by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers, and subsequently by: A. Salerno, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)
Re:
Civil Service — Action for annulment of the decision of the Commission to consider certain financial aid from a Member State to students in higher education to be allowances of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct that financial aid from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of such students and annulment of the decision to seek repayment of sums unduly paid.
Operative part of the order
1.The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Finch, is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.The action, in so far as submitted by Mr Jargeac, Mr Aliaga Artero, Mr Charrière, Mr Clarke, Ms Domingues, Ms Hughes, Mr Lanneluc and Mr Zein, is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.
3.Mr Jargeac and the other eight officials or former officials whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(1) OJ C 347, 26.11.2011, p. 47.
* * *
Language of the case: French