I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2019/C 399/90)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: UPL Europe Ltd (Warrington Cheshire, United Kingdom) and Aceto Agricultural Chemical Corp. Ltd (Port Washington, United States) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/989 of 17 June 2019; (1)
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted further to manifest errors of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation results from a procedure during which the applicants’ rights of defence have not been respected.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the precautionary principle.
—
(1) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/989 of 17 June 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorpropham, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2019 L 160, p. 11).