- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-720/15: Action brought on 04 December 2015 — Commission v CINAR
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0720
62015TN0720
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 59/38
(Case T-720/15)
(2016/C 059/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, A. Duron, lawyer, S. Delaude, agent, L. Di Paolo, agent, and J. Estrada de Solà, agent)
Defendant: CINAR Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—condemn the defendant to reimburse GBP 25 616 to the applicant;
—condemn the defendant to pay interest on the principal amount of GBP 25 616 at the rate applied by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations on 1 December 2005 (2,09 %) plus one and a half percentage points, covering the period running from 6 December 2005 until the date of receipt of the funds to be reimbursed; and
—order the defendant to pay all costs and expenses in these proceedings.
Plea in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law alleging that the defendant has breached its contractual obligations regarding the justification of costs claimed. As the financial contribution due to the defendant is less than the total amount paid by the applicant by means of an advance payment, the applicant contends that, under the contract, the defendant is liable for the sum due.