- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-252/11: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 October 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — Erika Šujetová v Rapid life životná poisťovňa as (Reference for a preliminary ruling — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CB0252
62011CB0252
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.4.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 101/2
(Case C-252/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 101/02
Language of the case: Slovak
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Erika Šujetová
Defendant: Rapid life životná poisťovňa as
Re:
Request for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia) — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) — Provision of national law under which exclusive jurisdiction in relation to an application for annulment of an arbitral award is attributed to the court in whose area of jurisdiction the arbitration proceedings took place — Provision of national law under which that court is under an obligation, upon annulling an arbitral award, to continue the main proceedings without re-examining its territorial jurisdiction — Unfair arbitration agreement or arbitration clause
Operative part of the order
It is not necessary to give a ruling on the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia), by decision of 7 April 2011 in Case C-252/11.
*
Language of the case: Slovak.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.