- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-460/24, Schoger: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 May 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht – Austria) – ***X*** v Finanzambt für Großbetriebe (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Tax exemption for supplies made between undertakings carrying out transactions primarily in the banking, insurance or pension funds sector – Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Lack of sufficient information – Subject matter of the dispute – Requirement that the questions must be necessary – Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CB0460
62024CB0460
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/4256
11.8.2025
(Case C-460/24,
(1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Tax exemption for supplies made between undertakings carrying out transactions primarily in the banking, insurance or pension funds sector - Requirement to set out the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Subject matter of the dispute - Requirement that the questions must be necessary - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/4256)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: ***X***
Defendant: Finanzamt für Großbetriebe
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Bundesfinanzgericht (Federal Finance Court, Austria), by decision of 28 June 2024, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
(1) OJ C, C/2024/5498.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4256/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—