I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-537/22)
(2022/C 418/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Delta Sport Handelskontor GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Klawitter and L-E. Appel, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego A/S (Billund, Denmark)
Proprietor of the design at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: European Union design No 1 664 368-0006
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2022 in Case R 1524/2021-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and, if the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO intervenes, the intervener to bear the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 8(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.