- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-164/24: Action brought on 25 March 2024 – Fashion Box v EUIPO – Ghostthinker (RE:PLAY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0164
62024TN0164
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3085
13.5.2024
(Case T-164/24)
(C/2024/3085)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Fashion Box SpA (Asolo, Italy) (represented by: A. Parassina and A. Giovannardi, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ghostthinker GmbH (Augsburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word trade mark RE:PLAY – Application for registration No 18 376 980
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 January 2024 in Case R 424/2023-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to reject the EUTM application No 18 376 980 for RE:PLAY;
—order Ghostthinker GmbH to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Violation of the principles of equal treatment and sound administration.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3085/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—