- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-732/20: Action brought on 16 December 2020 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0732
62020TN0732
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.2.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/59
(Case T-732/20)
(2021/C 44/81)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Andreas Freundlieb (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CRYSTAL — EU trade mark No 8 372 591
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2020 in Case R 1056/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and order that his rights in EU trade mark No 8 372 591 be re-established in accordance with his application;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 104(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.