I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/4473)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Groupvet EE (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: O. Dimina, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Loretta Philipp (Hitzhusen, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ALFAVET – Application for registration No 18 818 375
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2025 in Case R 1869/2024-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision insofar as it rejected the application for all goods in Classes 3, 10 (partially), 31, and services in Class 44;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs;
—order the intervener, if any, to bear its own cost.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 33(7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of general principles of Union law to avoid the need for proof of use;
—Infringement of the procedural rules of locus standi for filing an opposition.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4473/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—