I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 211/37)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Tigers GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Landshut
I.Does Article 1(3) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 (1) of 13 May 2013 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China allow a valid commercial invoice presented for the purposes of the initial fixing of a definitive anti-dumping duty to be submitted retrospectively where all the other conditions necessary for obtaining an individual anti-dumping duty rate are satisfied?
II.In the event that the first question is answered in the negative: Does Article 78 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2) of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 (3) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, preclude the customs authority, in the course of a revision procedure, from refusing to refund an anti-dumping duty on the ground that the declarant did not present a valid commercial invoice until after the customs declaration had been made?
(1) OJ 2013 L 131, p. 1.
(2) OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.
(3) Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 2000 L 311, p. 17).