- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-311/22: Action brought on 25 May 2022 — AMO Development v EUIPO (Medical instruments)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0311
62022TN0311
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 276/18
(Case T-311/22)
(2022/C 276/26)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: AMO Development LLC (Santa Ana, California, United States) (represented by: J. Day, Solicitor, and T. de Haan, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Design: Community designs Nos 2 712 885-0001 and 2 712 885-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 March 2022 in Case R 1433/2021-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 67(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.