- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-781/23, Malmö Motorrenovering: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 18 December 2023 — Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0781
62023CN0781
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2024/1545
26.2.2024
(Case C-781/23, Malmö Motorrenovering)
(C/2024/1545)
Language of the case: Swedish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Malmö Motorrenovering AB
Respondent: Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket
Question referred
Must Article 251 of the Union Customs Code (1) be interpreted as meaning that the reference in paragraph 3 to paragraphs 1 and 2 means that the requirement for exceptional circumstances in paragraph 3 applies only where a period already granted, together with an extension applied for, would mean that the overall period during which the goods may remain under the procedure in question exceeds 24 months? Or must the article be interpreted as meaning that the requirement for exceptional circumstances in paragraph 3 is applicable to all applications for an extension, that is to say, even if the period already granted, together with the extension applied for, does not exceed the 24-month period laid down in paragraph 2?
(1) Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ 2013 L 269, p. 1).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1545/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)