I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-381/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Community mark B. Antonio Basile 1952 - Earlier national mark BASILE - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Limitation in consequence of acquiescence - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 53(2) - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1) of that regulation - Likelihood of confusion)
2013/C 225/86
Language of the case: Italian
Appellant: I Marchi Italiani Srl (represented by: L. Militerni and G. Militerni, avvocati)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent), Osra SA
Appeal lodged against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 June 2012 in Case T-133/09 I Marchi Italiani and Basile v OHIM — Osra (B. Antonio Basile 1952) by which that court dismissed an action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 January 2009 (Case R 502/2008-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between Osra SA and I Marchi Italiani Srl — Misapplication of Article 135 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Infringement of the principle of good faith — Limitation in consequence of acquiescence — Prerequisites for the limitation period to run — Likelihood of confusion — Incorrect assessment of the similarity of the marks at issue
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.I Marchi Italiani Srl shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 303, 6.10.2012
Language of the case: Italian