I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
8.4.2024
(Case C-674/22, (1) Gemeente Dinkelland)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxes levied in breach of EU law - Obligation to refund value added tax (VAT) and to pay interest on that amount - Refund resulting from errors made in the taxable person’s accounts - Refund resulting from the retroactive amendment of the detailed rules for calculating the deductible VAT relating to the taxable person’s general costs)
(C/2024/2395)
Language of the case: Dutch
Applicant: Gemeente Dinkelland
Defendant: Ontvanger van de Belastingdienst/Grote ondernemingen, kantoor Zwolle
EU law must be interpreted as not requiring the payment of interest to a taxable person as from the payment of an amount of value added tax (VAT) which is subsequently refunded by the tax authority, where that refund results, in part, from the finding that that taxable person, due to errors in its accounts, did not fully exercise its right to deduct input VAT for the years concerned and, in part, from an amendment, with retroactive effect, of the detailed rules for calculating the deductible VAT relating to the general costs of that taxable person where those rules are established under the sole responsibility of that taxable person.
—
(1) OJ C 45, 6.2.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2395/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—