EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-181/23: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 April 2025 – Commission v Malta (Citizenship by investment) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 20 TFEU – Citizenship of the Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Principle of mutual trust between the Member States – Grant of the nationality of a Member State – Special relationship of solidarity and good faith – Operation of an investor citizenship scheme – Naturalisation in exchange for predetermined payments or investments – Transactional nature of the naturalisation scheme, which amounts to the commercialisation of Union citizenship)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0181

62023CA0181

April 29, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3238

24.6.2025

(Case C-181/23)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 20 TFEU - Citizenship of the Union - Article 4(3) TEU - Principle of sincere cooperation - Principle of mutual trust between the Member States - Grant of the nationality of a Member State - Special relationship of solidarity and good faith - Operation of an investor citizenship scheme - Naturalisation in exchange for predetermined payments or investments - Transactional nature of the naturalisation scheme, which amounts to the ‘commercialisation’ of Union citizenship)

(C/2025/3238)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ladenburger, E. Montaguti and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Malta (represented by: A. Buhagiar, acting as Agent, and by D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero, abogado)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Declares that, by establishing and operating an institutionalised citizenship investment scheme, such as the Maltese Citizenship by Naturalisation for Exceptional Services by Direct Investment scheme, based on Article 10(9) of the Maltese Citizenship Act (Chapter 188 of the Laws of Malta), as amended by the Maltese Citizenship (Amendment No. 2) Act (Act XXXVIII of 2020) and the Granting of citizenship for Exceptional Services Regulations, 2020 (Subsidiary Legislation 188.06 of the Laws of Malta), which establishes a transactional naturalisation procedure in exchange for predetermined payments or investments and thus amounts to the commercialisation of the grant of the nationality of a Member State and, by extension, that of Union citizenship, the Republic of Malta has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 20 TFEU and Article 4(3) TEU.

Orders the Republic of Malta to pay the costs.

(1)

OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3238/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia