- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-528/15: Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Bimbo v OHIM — Globo (Bimbo)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0528
62015TN0528
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/48
(Case T-528/15)
(2015/C 381/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Bimbo, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Globo SpA Servizi Commerciali (Illasi, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Bimbo’ — Application for registration No 10 028 405
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 July 2015 in Joined Cases R 2512/2013-4 and R 2549/2013-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—modify the contested decision in accordance with Article 65.3 CTMR, rejecting the CTM Application no 10 028 405 in class 28;
—subsidiarity and only in the case the above claim would be rejected, annul the contested decision
—order the defendants to pay the costs, as stated in article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court (former 87.2).
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Rule 19(1) (2) (3) and Rule 20(1) of the Regulation No 2868/95;
—Infringement of Article 64(1) of the Regulation No 207/2009 and related case-law;
—Infringement of Article 43(2) and (3) of the Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of the Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 8(5) of the Regulation No 207/2009.