I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury – Earlier national word mark Merkur – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 20, 39-40)
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2009 (Case R 1266/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between adp Gauselmann GmbH and Archer Maclean.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury, for goods in Classes 9, 16 and 28 – Application No 4290227
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
German trade mark registration of the word mark Merkur for goods and services in Classes 6, 9, 28, 35, 37, 41 and 42
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition dismissed
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders adp Gauselmann GmbH to pay the costs.