I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-665/18) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom to provide services - Restrictions - Games of chance - National taxes on the operation of slot machines in amusement arcades - National legislation increasing the amount of a tax five-fold and introducing an additional tax)
(2019/C 288/08)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: Pólus Vegas Kft.
Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Article 56 TFEU, read in the light of the judgment of 11 June 2015, Berlington Hungary and Others (C-98/14, EU:C:2015:386), must be interpreted as meaning, in so far as concerns the operation of slot machines in a Member State, a cross-border situation cannot be presumed to exist on the sole ground that EU citizens from other Member States may avail themselves of such gaming opportunities.
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:122
* * *
(2019/C 288/08)