I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-15/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeals - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 826/2009 - Imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Article 2(10)(b) - Fair comparison - Article 11(9) - Interim partial review - Obligation to apply the same methodology as in the investigation leading to the imposition of the duty - Change in circumstances)
2013/C 336/11
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and R. Luff, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt, and by N. Chesaites, Barrister), European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents)
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2011 in Case T-423/09 Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials v Council, by which the General Court dismissed the application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 826/2009 of 7 September 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1659/2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain magnesia bricks originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 240, p. 7) — Comparison between the normal value and the export price — Taking into account the value added tax of the country of origin — Application of a different methodology from that used in the initial investigation — Errors of law
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Materials Co. Ltd to pay the costs of the present proceedings;
3.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.