I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2022 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 8 - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Demonstration of the prospect of promotion - Admissibility - Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations - Guiding multiplication rates - Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Comparison of merits)
(C/2025/3275)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Ville Kivikoski (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium), Ottavia Maffia (Brussels, Belgium), Peter Pristovnik (Brussels) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and I. Demoulin, acting as Agents)
By their action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decision of the Council of the European Union of 13 July 2022 not to promote them to grade AST 8 under the 2022 promotion exercise.
The Court:
Annuls the decision of the Council of the European Union of 13 July 2022 not to promote Ville Kivikoski, Ottavia Maffia and Peter Pristovnik to grade AST 8 under the 2022 promotion exercise.
Orders the Council to pay the costs.
—
OJ C 205, 12.6.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3275/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—