- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-184/22: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2023 — Eggers & Franke v EUIPO — E. & J. Gallo Winery (E & F) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TB0184
62022TB0184
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/32
(Case T-184/22) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 189/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez and T. Klee, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: E. & J. Gallo Winery (Modesto, California, United States) (represented by: V. von Bomhard and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2022 (Case R 730/2021-5), relating to opposition proceedings between E. & J. Gallo Winery and Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Eggers & Franke Holding GmbH and E. & J. Gallo Winery shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.