EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-253/24, Pelavi: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte di Appello di L’Aquila (Italy) lodged on 9 April 2024 – Ministero della Giustizia v NZ

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0253

62024CN0253

April 9, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4952

19.8.2024

(Case C-253/24, Pelavi)

(C/2024/4952)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Defendant and appellant: Ministero della Giustizia

Applicant and respondent: NZ

Questions referred

1.Do Articles 31(1) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC and Clause 4 of the Framework Agreement on Fixed-term Work preclude national legislation which provides that an honorary judge, who may be classified as a ‘worker’ and a ‘fixed-term worker’ and who is confirmed in post until the age of 70, forfeits the right to paid leave for the period prior to the confirmation?

2.Does Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on Fixed-term Work preclude national legislation which, as a measure aimed at penalising the misuse of fixed-term contracts, provides for the confirmation in post of the honorary judge until the age of 70, after passing a non-competitive assessment procedure, and – in the event of failing the assessment procedure – provides for an allowance, in both cases requiring a waiver of any rights previously accrued?

The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.

Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4952/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia