I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 118/53)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Danila Facchinello (Molinella, Italy) (represented by: F. Torlontano, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Olimpia Splendid SpA (Gualtieri, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Synthesis’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 71 069
Procedure before OHIM: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 in Case R 2169/2013-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 and, consequently, declare that the Community trade mark Synthesis is not revoked in respect of goods in Class 11 (apparatus for air conditioning);
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009, insofar as the First Board of Appeal revoked the Community trade mark on the ground that the evidence adduced by its proprietor was not capable of establishing genuine use of that mark.