- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-835/19: Action brought on 6 December 2019 – CrossFit v EUIPO – Hochwarter (CROSSBOX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0835
62019TN0835
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 36/38
—
(Case T-835/19)
(2020/C 36/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: CrossFit Inc. (Scotts Valley, California, United States) (represented by: D. Mărginean, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marlis Hochwarter (Vienna, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark CROSSBOX – European Union trade mark No 12 503 471
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2019 in Case R 1832/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred before the General Court.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 53(1)(a) corroborated with Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 of the Council.
—